“Nevertheless, the report was lopsided in a number of respects as listed below:

“First, the report creates an illusion of an equal amount of violence against Christians and Muslims. This is not the case, as a cursory reading of national dailies during the period would reveal. Particularly in North Central Nigeria, Christians and communities of ethnic nationalities have been victims of a steady stream of violent attacks and killings throughout 2018 and in the years leading up to it. However, from 2009, Boko Haram escalated frontal attacks against State agents and specifically targeted Churches for attacks in the Northeast.

“Secondly, the report speaks of “clashes between farmers and herders.” This is a misleading narrative and a distortion of reality. The 2018 Global Terrorism Index report reveals that “Fulani herdsmen killed nearly 1,700 people” between January and September only – six times more than those killed by Boko Haram during the same period. According to the report, “78% of deaths committed by Fulani extremists since 2010 have been carried out as armed assaults.” This certainly does NOT fit the definition of ‘clashes.’ Most of these violent attacks took place in the predominantly Christian “Middle Belt” region, notably Benue, Plateau, Kaduna (Southern), Taraba and Adamawa States. AK-47-wielding gunmen described as herders, some armed with military-cadre sophisticated weapons and machetes, launched attacks against civilian communities leaving many dead, widowed, orphaned, homeless and dispossessed of their lands. Many of the victims fled their communities and thousands are now Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs). Some Southern States have also come under attacks.

“It is important to note that climate change, desertification, urbanization development have impacted land use pre-dating 2009. Therefore, the upsurge in these attacks requires a nuanced explanatory framework that includes ideology, links with global terrorist agendas, land grabbing/occupation, identity-based interests/hostilities. The failure of de-radicalization efforts mentioned in the USCIRF report shows the critical role of ideology/theology of violence in Nigeria. Many who underwent such ideologically inspired programmes went back to their groups and networks. The fact remains that Christians in Northern Nigeria are targeted for violence primarily on account of their faith and social identity along with their ethnicity, gender, occupation and land ownership.

“Third, in its summary, substance and recommendations, the report downplayed the incidence, intensity and severity of violent attacks targeted at Christian communities and individuals. For instance, the report specifically identifies the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMIN), and its leader El-Zakzakky as victims of State repression and violence. Yet, it fails to mention Christian religious leaders, such as the two Reverend Fathers – Joseph Gor and Felix Tyolaha – who were murdered along with 17 other worshippers in St. Ignatius Parish in Mbalom, Benue State on April 24 2018.

“They were targeted and brutally killed during morning mass. They were neither farmers nor land owners involved in any land disputes. In fact, one of the priests had fled from attacks in his Parish.

“Not only did the report not mention these martyrs by name or even the name of their Church, it went on to narrate a fictional claim of reprisals against Muslims which never happened in Mbalon.

“Finally, the report was silent on State-based structural and systemic discrimination against Christians at State, Community and Federal levels. This has been going on in Northern Nigeria since the Usman Dan Fodio jihad a century ago. Structural violence can be seen in the current brazen lopsided nature of federal appointments which are openly skewed against Christians in violation of the Federal Character Principle of fair and equitable representation enshrined under the Section 17 (5) and (10) of the 1999 Constitution. In order to guarantee the rights of all to justice, equity and human rights protection and promotion, it is essential that any situational analyses of religious freedom in Nigeria needs to intentionally refrains from political correctness by stating the facts just as they truly are. Perpetrators and victims/survivors of violence should be clearly identified, reported and recommendations put forward accordingly. Given the above, we feel that Nigeria qualifies for CPC designation if all the material facts were made available to you.

“Nonetheless, we very much commend the efforts made by USCIRF and DOS to document these atrocities. It is our hope that in the current reporting year (2019), the full facts will show the need to review the current designation to full CPC status as the government of Nigeria has shown unwillingness to end the impunity and rescue the citizens from sustained insecurity and the existential threat which Christians face in the country today.

“We thank you most sincerely and wish you a Happy New Year.”