ADUpdating your news feed...

NEWS EXPRESS is Nigeria’s leading online newspaper. Published by Africa’s international award-winning journalist, Mr. Isaac Umunna, NEWS EXPRESS is Nigeria’s first truly professional online daily newspaper. It is published from Lagos, Nigeria’s economic and media hub, and has a provision for occasional special print editions. Thanks to our vast network of sources and dedicated team of professional journalists and contributors spread across Nigeria and overseas, NEWS EXPRESS has become synonymous with newsbreaks and exclusive stories from around the world.























Loading banners
Loading banners...


EFCC Chairman Olukoyede
By SANDRA UMEH
A Federal High Court in Ikoyi, Lagos State, has ordered substituted service of contempt of court processes to the Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mr Ola Olukoyede.
Justice Dehinde Dipolu authorised substituted service of Form 48, Notice of Consequences of Disobedience to Order of Court, to the EFCC chairman, through the commission’s Legal Department in Abuja.
The order followed an application by the Founder/Managing Director of Chappal Energies, Mr Ufoma Immanuel.
The application was granted by Dipolu.
A copy of the order was made available to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Lagos on Tuesday.
Immanuel’s application resulted from EFCC’s alleged continued disobedience of a court order and Immanuel’s failed attempts to effect service of the Form 48 personally on Olukoyede.
Immanuel’s counsel, Mr C.U. Wogu of Tunji Braithwaite Law Partners, had told the court that attempts to serve the notice to the EFCC chairman were frustrated.
The EFCC had, acting on a petition to it by Immanuel’s business partner, Mr Adebisi Adebutu of R28 Ltd., declared Immanuel wanted in a public notice on its social media platforms on Nov. 19, 2025.
The commission declared Immanuel wanted in a case of obtaining money by false pretences and forgery.
The case resulted from
control of Chappal Energies and shareholder rights.
The commission made the publication in spite a subsisting order by Justice Josephine Obanor of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, on Sept. 11, 2025.
Obanor had restrained the EFCC and other respondents from taking any steps to arrest, detain, or prosecute Immanuel in respect of any issues emanating from the shareholding arrangements, cross-shareholding agreements, subscription rights, and performance of contractual obligations involving him (Immanuel) and Adebutu.
The judge also held that the case was civil in nature.
The EFCC, however, began criminal proceedings against Immanuel in another court of coordinate jurisdiction.
Immanuel, through his counsel, had challenged the publication by the EFCC at the Federal High Court, Lagos.
On Feb. 10, 2026, Dipolu, ruled that the publication amounted to infringement of Immanuel’s constitutional rights to personal liberty and freedom of movement.
The judge also held that the commission lacked the power to restrain Immanuel’s fundamental rights on the matter in spite of a subsisting court order.
The judge ordered the EFCC to withdraw all publications declaring Immanuel wanted and replace them with a public notice retracting the declaration.
Dipolu also directed the EFCC to pay Immanuel five million Naira as compensation for infringing on his rights to personal liberty, freedom of movement and dignity.
In the latest order, Dipolu granted Immanuel’s prayer for substituted service, but declined to deem the service automatically sufficient.
The EFCC, on March 11, 2026, arraigned Immanuel alongside his company, Intermediate Investment Holdings Ltd., before Justice Mojisola Dada of the High Court of Lagos State, Ikeja Division, on a two-count charge of forgery and obtaining $1.5 million by false pretences.
However, in October 2026, Obanor issued a restrictive injunction, reaffirming her earlier order and restraining the commission from continuing with the criminal proceedings at the High Court of Lagos State.
The judge held that the Sept. 11, 2025 court order remained binding on the EFCC and other respondents since it had neither been set aside nor lawfully discharged. (NAN)