The office of former President Goodluck Jonathan has moved to clarify what it described as widespread misinterpretation of his recent remarks on youth participation in governance, stressing that he did not advocate imposing an age limit on political leadership.

In a statement issued Monday, Media Adviser Ikechukwu Eze said commentary circulating on social media suggesting that Jonathan proposed a maximum leadership age of 50 misrepresented the context of his speech delivered during events marking the 50th anniversary of the death of Murtala Mohammed.

Eze explained that Jonathan’s remarks were intended as a reflection on generational inclusion in leadership rather than a prescription for age-based exclusion. The former president, he said, had used historical examples to highlight the impact of youthful leadership.

“The event honoured Murtala Mohammed, who assumed office at the age of 36,” the statement said, noting that Jonathan referenced other young leaders of that era, including Olusegun Obasanjo, who became head of state at 38; Yakubu Gowon, who assumed power at 32; and Alfred Diete-Spiff, appointed military governor at 24.

According to the clarification, these examples were cited to underscore the historical contributions of young leaders and to encourage greater youth inclusion in governance across Africa.

Eze stressed that Jonathan’s core message focused on competence and capacity rather than age limits. “His remarks were a call for generational inclusion and leadership renewal, not an exclusion of older individuals from public service,” the statement said, adding that effective leadership should prioritise innovation, technological awareness and the stamina required for public office.

The statement also dismissed claims that Jonathan intended to disqualify older politicians, noting that he himself assumed Nigeria’s presidency in his fifties — making such an interpretation inconsistent with his own political trajectory.

It reiterated that the former president maintains leadership should be defined by vision, character and ability to serve, rather than age alone, expressing confidence that the clarification would address misunderstandings surrounding the speech. (The Sun)