While every one of the presidential candidates of the various parties is focusing on the economy, which is understandably so, security is key. Without security, there would be no robust economy. Those in the region ravaged by the Boko Haram insurgency can attest to this. So, it does matter so much what the presidential candidates, if elected into power in 2019, plan to do to end the problem of insurgency in t he country.

For ten years, Nigeria has continued in a war with the militant Islamist sect, Boko Haram. Within these years, the country has lost thousands of souls and humongous amount of money in cash and in property. She has also lost important military and health personnel trained with taxpayers’ money.

Today, government is not sure how many of her citizens are in Boko Haram captivity. Variegated numbers are being bandied.

Although government has since declared war against the sect, they have continued to wreak incalculable havoc on the country, so much that Nigeria has since joined the league of countries with a negative record on terrorism.

Despite government effort at ending the scourge of Boko Haram in the country, the sect has continued to maintain an effective control of the Sambisa Forest in Borno State, where it has maintained its operational base over the years.

Some analysts say that although the Federal Government says it is doing all its possible best to end terrorism in the country, the actions of the government in this regard is at variance with its claims.

Now, it appears that government is toying with another likely insurgent group, the Islamic Movement of Nigeria (IMN).The recent clash of members of the religious sect and security agents that left many dead was needless. Had the Federal Government heeded court order that released the sect’s leader, Sheik Ibrahim El-Zakzaky, on bail, the needless bloody clashes would have been avoided.

Observers say that the matter would assume a more worrisome dimension if El-Zakzaky should die in prison. According to the observers, it would mean that Nigeria would have attracted another version of Boko Haram.

They pointed out that a country like Iran that is known to support such violent groups would then declare a full-scale war against Nigeria and possibly begin to arm members of the sect for guerrilla warfare.

Last year, the Federal Government proscribed IPOB, but has consistently taken steps that encourage agitations.

“You accuse people of terrorism but it is your divisive policy that is fuelling hatred all over the place. I think there’s need to adopt a better and different strategy in order to achieve the much-talked-about peace. Those seeking elections must be clear in their mind what they want to achieve and how they can end the orgy of violence in the country. I think the coming election presents a good opportunity for Nigerians to take a better decision on what they want going forward,” the analyst added.

In its Editorial comment published on Wednesday, November 14, 2018, titled, ‘Again, federal vs presidential character’, it pointed out that“ It is a pity that, on the very sensitive matter of equitable representation in federal appointments, this administration has obdurately disrespected the letter and spirit of the provisions of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).”

The editorial drew attention to Chapter II (14)(3) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which specifically states that, “The composition of thegovernment of the Federation or any of its agenciesand the conduct of its affairs shall be carried outin such a manner as to reflect the federal character of Nigeria and the need to promote national unity, and also to command national loyalty, thereby ensuring that there shall be no predominance of personsfrom a few state or from a few ethnic or other sectional groups in that government, or in any of its agencies.”

It also pointed out that the refusal of government to abide by the letters of the Federal Character may have engendered a lot of strife in the polity, “Which was why it was not a surprise, after all, when senators from the South-east geopolitical zone the other day protested the non-representation of the zone in both the National Defence Council (NDC) and the National Security Council (NSC).

•Excerpted from a BusinessDay report

•Shiites leader, El-Zakzaky

While every one of the presidential candidates of the various parties is focusing on the economy, which is understandably so, security is key. Without security, there would be no robust economy. Those in the region ravaged by the Boko Haram insurgency can attest to this. So, it does matter so much what the presidential candidates, if elected into power in 2019, plan to do to end the problem of insurgency in t he country.

For ten years, Nigeria has continued in a war with the militant Islamist sect, Boko Haram. Within these years, the country has lost thousands of souls and humongous amount of money in cash and in property. She has also lost important military and health personnel trained with taxpayers’ money.

Today, government is not sure how many of her citizens are in Boko Haram captivity. Variegated numbers are being bandied.

Although government has since declared war against the sect, they have continued to wreak incalculable havoc on the country, so much that Nigeria has since joined the league of countries with a negative record on terrorism.

Despite government effort at ending the scourge of Boko Haram in the country, the sect has continued to maintain an effective control of the Sambisa Forest in Borno State, where it has maintained its operational base over the years.

Some analysts say that although the Federal Government says it is doing all its possible best to end terrorism in the country, the actions of the government in this regard is at variance with its claims.

Now, it appears that government is toying with another likely insurgent group, the Islamic Movement of Nigeria (IMN).The recent clash of members of the religious sect and security agents that left many dead was needless. Had the Federal Government heeded court order that released the sect’s leader, Sheik Ibrahim El-Zakzaky, on bail, the needless bloody clashes would have been avoided.

Observers say that the matter would assume a more worrisome dimension if El-Zakzaky should die in prison. According to the observers, it would mean that Nigeria would have attracted another version of Boko Haram.

They pointed out that a country like Iran that is known to support such violent groups would then declare a full-scale war against Nigeria and possibly begin to arm members of the sect for guerrilla warfare.

Last year, the Federal Government proscribed IPOB, but has consistently taken steps that encourage agitations.

“You accuse people of terrorism but it is your divisive policy that is fuelling hatred all over the place. I think there’s need to adopt a better and different strategy in order to achieve the much-talked-about peace. Those seeking elections must be clear in their mind what they want to achieve and how they can end the orgy of violence in the country. I think the coming election presents a good opportunity for Nigerians to take a better decision on what they want going forward,” the analyst added.

In its Editorial comment published on Wednesday, November 14, 2018, titled, ‘Again, federal vs presidential character’, it pointed out that“ It is a pity that, on the very sensitive matter of equitable representation in federal appointments, this administration has obdurately disrespected the letter and spirit of the provisions of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).”

The editorial drew attention to Chapter II (14)(3) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which specifically states that, “The composition of thegovernment of the Federation or any of its agenciesand the conduct of its affairs shall be carried outin such a manner as to reflect the federal character of Nigeria and the need to promote national unity, and also to command national loyalty, thereby ensuring that there shall be no predominance of personsfrom a few state or from a few ethnic or other sectional groups in that government, or in any of its agencies.”

It also pointed out that the refusal of government to abide by the letters of the Federal Character may have engendered a lot of strife in the polity, “Which was why it was not a surprise, after all, when senators from the South-east geopolitical zone the other day protested the non-representation of the zone in both the National Defence Council (NDC) and the National Security Council (NSC).

•Excerpted from a BusinessDay report