Opposition parties have faulted the Presidency’s celebration of the reported commendation letter from United States President Donald Trump to President Bola Tinubu over the fight against insecurity, with some questioning its authenticity.

While some parties described Trump’s letter as irrelevant to Nigeria’s security realities, others argued that the US’s President’s commendation should be viewed within the limited context of the fight against terrorism.

They spoke in separate interviews with Saturday PUNCH.

Their comments followed the Presidency’s announcement that Trump wrote to Tinubu, commending what it described as his “decisive leadership” in tackling insecurity and disclosing that the United States had deployed Special Operations Forces, including Navy SEAL Team 6, to train and support the Nigerian military in the fight against terrorism.

However, some opposition figures questioned the authenticity or significance of the letter, maintaining that it could not be interpreted as a blanket endorsement of the Tinubu administration’s handling of the country’s broader security challenges.

The National Publicity Secretary of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, Osa Director, dismissed the Presidency’s celebration of the reported letter, insisting that Nigerians would judge the government by conditions on the ground.

He said it was a shame that the government was celebrating diplomacy over the reality of the Nigerian situation.

“When you talk about diplomacy, people speak in such a way and manner that they don’t hit your nerves. Even if the Tinubu administration gets 1,000 letters and commendations from outside, what matters most is the reality and true conditions of the country.

“It is obvious that Nigerians are not happy. The security situation is still in a state that we cannot say the president should be commended or not. So, whether that letter is from Trump, the EU or anywhere, it’s irrelevant and it’s not a reflection of our reality,” Director said.

He lamented that Nigerians couldn’t move from one place to another because of insecurity, maintaining that Nigerians should be the ones to celebrate Tinubu and not a letter from the American president.

“I never knew that we could descend to this level of celebrating a letter from the President of the United States or wherever over a non-existent triumph over Nigeria’s insecurity. Everyone knows that the level of insecurity today is something that cannot be commended by any rational being,” he said.

Similarly, the National Coordinator of the Obidient Movement Worldwide, Dr Yunusa Tanko, also expressed doubts over the authenticity of Trump’s letter.

“I don’t know whether Trump is being misinformed. The U.S. has permanent knowledge of everything on their own and can run their own investigation.

“We hope this story is not cooked by some people because there is nothing this government cannot do. That’s just my worry,” he stated.

“I read that Trump had issued a statement commending the president for a job well done in terms of his efforts at curbing insecurity in Nigeria. Just yesterday again, I saw, while I was trying to lay my hands on the statement, another report that claimed there was nothing like that.

“So, as a matter of fact, I’m torn between believing that there was a letter and believing there was none, or that there was a letter and the content is not exactly what is being put out there for Nigerians to see. The whole thing has become like a drama to me.

“So, what they need to do is to come out to tell us whether a letter was truly written or not. I think that’s the way it should be,” he noted.

However, the National Publicity Secretary of the Labour Party, Ken Asogwa, said Trump’s reported remarks should be interpreted within the narrow context of terrorism and attacks on Christian communities rather than Nigeria’s broader security situation.

According to him, while there may have been some improvement in addressing the killing of Christians, the country’s insecurity remains complex and extends beyond terrorism.

He said, “I think Donald Trump’s comments, if you put it in proper context, he pointedly made reference to terrorism and killing of Christians, that there has been an improvement in that regard.

“I don’t think that that letter addressed holistically the entirety of the insecurity in Nigeria because the insecurity in Nigeria is multifaceted. It’s not just about the killing of Christians or terrorism.

“The banditry that is happening in the North-West wears a different look from what you are getting in the North Central where Christians are killed in Benue and Plateau.”

Asogwa noted that security challenges vary across different regions, citing banditry in the North-West, attacks in Benue and Plateau, insurgency in the North-East and violence in the South-East.

The opposition comments add to growing criticism of the Presidency’s handling of the reported correspondence.

On Thursday, the African Democratic Congress argued that the letter was merely a diplomatic communication and not an endorsement of Tinubu’s administration, insisting that Nigerians would judge the President by his performance on insecurity, the economy and living conditions.

The Allied People’s Movement also accused the Federal Government of misrepresenting the contents of the letter, maintaining that Trump only acknowledged Tinubu’s commitment to addressing terrorism rather than any concrete achievements.

Similarly, former Deputy National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress, Timi Frank, described the letter as a routine diplomatic exchange, arguing that it should not be interpreted as political support or an endorsement of the Tinubu administration.(Saturday PUNCH)

Update news