36 agonising days after gunmen swept through three schools in Oyo State and disappeared into the vast wilderness with dozens of pupils and teachers, the battle to secure their freedom has entered what security officials described as its most decisive stage.

Intelligence reports now suggest that the terrorists responsible for the abduction are effectively trapped within the sprawling Oyo National Park, where security forces have mounted a sustained operation aimed at rescuing the captives and dismantling the insurgent network behind the attack.

For families waiting anxiously for news of their children, however, every passing day feels like an eternity.

The abduction of 42 pupils and education workers from Baptist Nursery and Primary School, Yawota; L.A. Primary School; and Community Grammar School, Esiele, on May 15 sent shockwaves across Nigeria. It was not merely another kidnapping incident. It represented something far more troubling: the apparent expansion of extremist violence into a region long considered outside the traditional operational sphere of Boko Haram.

As troops intensified pressure on the kidnappers, the unfolding operation is revealing a dangerous and evolving security challenge, one that extended beyond the immediate fate of the hostages and raised broader concerns about the changing geography of terrorism in Nigeria.

Disturbing shift

For more than a decade, Boko Haram and its splinter factions have been associated primarily with Nigeria’s North-East. States such as Borno, Yobe and Adamawa became synonymous with insurgency, military offensives and humanitarian crises.

The Oyo school abduction has challenged that assumption.

Security sources involved in the rescue mission have identified the kidnappers as members of Jama’atu Ahlis-Sunna Lidda’Awati Wal-Jihad, widely known as Boko Haram. Intelligence assessments indicated that the group has established operational cells capable of exploiting forest corridors stretching across multiple states.

The significance of this development cannot be overstated. What began as a regional insurgency has increasingly demonstrated an ability to project influence beyond its traditional strongholds. The presence of suspected Boko Haram commanders in Oyo State underscored growing concerns among security analysts that extremist networks are seeking new operational spaces amid intensified military pressure elsewhere.

A retired security analyst familiar with counter-insurgency operations described the development as “a warning signal that terrorism in Nigeria is becoming more adaptive and geographically fluid.”

“The assumption that the South-West is immune from extremist infiltration can no longer be sustained”, he said. “What we are witnessing is an insurgent movement attempting to create new footholds while avoiding direct confrontation in areas where military pressure remains intense”.

Forest siege

According to intelligence sources, security forces have successfully restricted escape routes within Oyo National Park, creating what one operative described as a “containment environment” around the kidnappers. The operation involved a combination of military personnel, intelligence officers and other security agencies working in coordination to prevent the insurgents from breaking through the security cordon.

Yet containment has not translated into a swift rescue. The forest itself presented formidable challenges. Oyo National Park covers thousands of square kilometres of rugged terrain characterised by dense vegetation, isolated pathways and difficult access routes.

Such environments have historically favoured irregular armed groups. Security officials maintained that the terrorists have exploited these advantages with alarming sophistication. Improvised explosive devices have reportedly been planted across strategic sections of the forest, turning ordinary footpaths into potential death traps. Troops advancing through the area are therefore forced to proceed cautiously, slowing operational momentum.

The consequences have already been severe. Several security personnel have reportedly lost their lives during clashes with the insurgents, including a Nigerian Army lieutenant. Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde recently confirmed casualties among soldiers participating in the operation. Their deaths underscored the risks confronting security forces engaged in rescue missions where speed must be balanced against safety.

“This is not a conventional battlefield. The terrorists are mobile, they know the terrain, and they are constantly changing locations. Every movement has to be carefully planned because a single mistake can result in casualties among troops or hostages,” one security source explained.

Human shields

Perhaps the greatest obstacle facing military planners was the reported use of the abducted pupils and teachers as human shields. Security officials believed the victims are being held within or near terrorist encampments, making direct military action extraordinarily risky.

This dilemma has become a familiar feature of modern counter-terrorism operations worldwide. When hostages are embedded within armed groups, commanders face difficult choices. Aggressive assaults may increase the chances of neutralising terrorists but simultaneously heightened the risk of civilian casualties.

In Oyo, officials appeared determined to avoid such outcomes. According to intelligence assessments, the insurgents have deliberately positioned themselves around the captives to discourage direct attacks. More than 200 fighters are believed to be operating in areas linked to the hostages’ detention.

Military strategists said this tactic was designed to exploit the government’s commitment to preserving innocent lives. One senior security observer noted that successful hostage rescue operations often depend more on patience, intelligence gathering and precision than overwhelming force.

“Every parent understandably wants immediate action. But rescue missions of this nature require extraordinary restraint”, he said. “The objective is not simply to eliminate the terrorists; It is to bring the children and teachers home alive”.

Demand for prisoner exchange

Investigations have also revealed a disturbing dimension to the crisis. The kidnappers are reportedly demanding the release of two senior Boko Haram figures: Mahmud Usman, known by aliases including Abu Bara’a and Abbas Mukhtar, and his deputy, Abubakar Abba.

The demand reflected a pattern observed in several insurgent conflicts globally, where hostage-taking served strategic rather than purely financial objectives. By seeking the release of key commanders, the terrorists are attempting to convert human suffering into political leverage.

Authorities, however, appeared unwilling to yield. Security sources indicated that government officials have ruled out negotiations involving prisoner exchanges, maintaining a position that rewards for terrorism would create dangerous precedents and potentially encourage further kidnappings.

That stance is consistent with Nigeria’s broader counter-terrorism policy, though it inevitably raises difficult questions. Families desperate for the safe return of their loved ones often prioritised immediate rescue over long-term strategic considerations. Governments, meanwhile, must weigh humanitarian concerns against national security implications. It remained one of the most painful dilemmas in counter-insurgency policy.

Why rescue has taken so long?

For many Nigerians, the central question remained straightforward: why has the rescue operation lasted more than a month? Security experts point to several factors:

The terrain itself: Forest-based operations are inherently slow and resource-intensive.

Extensive use of explosives: Insurgents have mined routes, forcing troops to clear paths carefully before advancing.

Mobility of the kidnappers: Intelligence reports suggest that the hostages are frequently relocated, sometimes on a near-daily basis.

Presence of human shields: This creates a highly dynamic operational environment where conventional military tactics are often ineffective.

A former intelligence officer explained to Sunday Vanguard that public expectations are sometimes shaped by unrealistic perceptions of modern military capabilities.

“People imagine that once terrorists are located, a rescue can happen overnight. In reality, locating a camp and conducting a successful hostage recovery are completely different things”, he said. “The safest option is often to isolate, monitor and gradually reduce the enemy’s freedom of movement until an opportunity emerges”.

Diversionary attacks, wider security concerns

Intelligence sources involved in the operation believed recent attacks linked to Boko Haram elsewhere in the country may be connected to the pressure being exerted on the Oyo-based cell. According to officials, the insurgents could be attempting to stretch security resources and create opportunities for trapped fighters to escape.

Such tactics are consistent with insurgent doctrine. By opening multiple fronts simultaneously, extremist groups sought to force governments into dispersing personnel and resources, thereby reducing pressure on critical locations.

If confirmed, the strategy would highlight the interconnected nature of Nigeria’s security challenges. The Oyo crisis cannot be viewed in isolation. Rather, it formed part of a broader contest between security forces and insurgent networks that increasingly operate across regional and geographical boundaries.

Silence

Throughout the crisis, Oyo State government has maintained an unusually cautious communications strategy. Officials have deliberately limited public disclosures regarding operational details, arguing that excessive transparency could jeopardise rescue efforts.

Commissioner for Information, Prince Dotun Oyelade, reiterated the government’s commitment to restricting updates to authorised channels.

“Our primary concern is the safety and wellbeing of the abducted pupils and teachers. We will avoid any disclosure that could compromise ongoing efforts to secure their safe return”, he said.

While the approach has attracted criticism from some quarters, security professionals generally supported operational secrecy during hostage situations. Information released publicly can inadvertently aid kidnappers, reveal military intentions or compromise intelligence sources. Nonetheless, prolonged silence can also fuel anxiety, speculation and misinformation. The challenge for government, is therefore, finding the delicate balance between operational security and public accountability.

Human cost

Beyond military calculations and intelligence assessments lied the human reality of the crisis. For the families of the abducted pupils and teachers, every day is marked by uncertainty.

Parents who once worried about examination results now worried about survival. Classrooms that should be filled with lessons and laughter have become symbols of fear. Teachers who dedicated their lives to education remained trapped in circumstances beyond their control.

Psychologists warned that prolonged captivity can leave lasting emotional scars, particularly among children. Even after release, many survivors will require extensive support to address trauma, anxiety and disrupted educational development.

The Impact, therefore, extended far beyond the immediate crisis. Communities affected by school abductions often experienced long-term declines in school attendance as parents become reluctant to send children into environments perceived as unsafe.

Protecting schools beyond crisis

The Oyo abduction has once again highlighted the vulnerability of educational institutions across Nigeria. Despite significant investments in school protection initiatives, gaps remained.

Security specialists argued that safeguarding schools required more than military deployments. It demanded improved intelligence gathering, stronger community partnerships, better emergency response systems and sustained investment in rural security infrastructure.

Technology may also play a growing role. Early warning systems, surveillance capabilities and enhanced communication networks could significantly improve response times during future emergencies. Yet experts cautioned that security measures alone cannot eliminate the threat. Addressing the socio-economic conditions that extremist groups exploit remained equally important.

Defining test

As the rescue mission entered a critical phase, Nigeria faces a defining test. The operation will not merely determine the fate of 42 abducted pupils and education workers. It will also shape public confidence in the state’s capacity to confront emerging security threats beyond traditional conflict zones.

The containment of the kidnappers within Oyo National Park represented a significant operational achievement. But containment is not the same as resolution. The ultimate measure of success will be the safe return of the hostages.

Until then, families wait, security forces advance cautiously through a dangerous landscape, and the nation watches anxiously. Somewhere within the forests of Oyo, children who should be preparing for lessons remained in captivity. Their rescue has become more than a military objective. It has become a national imperative. (Vanguard)

Update news