Mixed reactions yesterday trailed the Federal Government’s approval of the new 2026 fiscal policy which reduced import tariffs on drugs and pharmaceutical products, cars and rice, among others.

While players in the pharmaceutical sector hailed government’s new move, rice producers and those in the automobile sector regretted the move, said the policy would be inimical to their business.

Recall that the Federal Government had in a document dated April 1, 2026, by the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Mr. Wale Edun, approved sweeping tariff adjustments across 127 product lines, including antimalarial medicaments now pegged at 20 per cent, as part of efforts to stimulate growth and ease the cost of critical imports.

While pharmacists say the policy could improve access to essential medicines, they insisted that weak regulation, counterfeit drugs, and poor support for local manufacturing remained major obstacles.

In an interview with Vanguard, the President of the Pharmaceutical Society of Nigeria, PSN, Ayuba-Tanko Ibrahim, described the tariff cut as a positive step but cautioned that the gains would depend on complementary policy actions.

“A drop in duties on drugs and pharmaceutical products is quite laudable. In normal circumstances, this should signpost a drop in prices of these products and promote accessibility to drugs and healthcare, albeit legitimately.

“The PSN appreciates and commends the commitment of the federal government in the ensuing scenario,” he said.

However, he warned that more needed to be done to sanitise the sector, Ibrahim said: “It is noteworthy that the federal government must do a little more in terms of regulation and control of drug matters in Nigeria.

“Government must see a need for urgent intervention with a template akin to an all-purpose special vehicle that can help fix fundamental issues pertaining to local manufacture and drug prices.”

He further highlighted the persistent challenge of fake and counterfeit medicines, stressing that “we must redress the issue of fake and counterfeit drugs, especially because of the unending cycle of a preponderance of unregistered pharmaceutical premises.

“There is also a need to support local content in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients, APIs, and vaccines availability to increase the contribution of the pharmaceutical sector to national GDP.”

He also called for the implementation of long-delayed policies.

“Once again, we must ensure that the Federal Ministry of Health-approved National Drug Distribution Guidelines, NDDG, sees the light of day. For this and more, we have in the past urged the federal government to set up a presidential committee on the Pharma sector which will be driven by a seasoned registered pharmacist.

“Lawfully and experientially, only the technical skills of a pharmacist can fix this mandate,” Ibrahim stressed.

On his part, former PSN President, Mr Olumide Akintayo, said the tariff cut aligned with the National Drug Policy 2021 but questioned why similar interventions in the past failed to yield expected results.

“We must salute the sagacious conduct of the Federal Government for another well-intended move to improve accessibility to affordable drugs in line with the National Drug Policy 2021.

“This development throws up a kaleidoscope of colours, but the critical and fundamental question is why we are not getting results from the paradigm shifts the government attempts to bring to bear in the pharma sector,” Akintayo added.

According to him, the problem lies in poor implementation, driven by the wrong expertise.

“There is one major reason, which borders on the perennial utilisation of wrong drivers to move a purely creative endeavour like the pharma sector.

“Recall the attempt of the federal government to reduce drug prices through an Executive Order about two years ago. We warned that the move would be dead on arrival if salient professional parameters were not built ab initio into the concept. The results are there for all to appraise today,” he said.

Akintayo called for a return to foundational reforms, insisting that “we must start from basics, including redressing regulatory fees in our sector, while also allowing the trade and commerce ministry to handle certain fundamental approvals wrongly appropriated by some MDAs, probably on the basis of naivety,” he noted.

Similarly, National Chairman of the Association of Community Pharmacists of Nigeria, ACPN, Mr Ambrose Ezeh, called for a change in government strategy, insisting that technical issues in the sector required professional leadership.

“For the umpteenth time, we strongly solicit a change of strategy in government’s resolve to reduce drug costs.

“This is both a technical and professional matter best left in the hands of a Presidential Committee on an ad hoc basis with defined terms of reference within a given timeline,” Ezeh said.

While emphasising the role of pharmacists in policy coordination, he said further: “This might work out if the federal government consults the PSN to recommend fit and proper persons for such a national assignment.

‘’You will agree that similar efforts not coordinated directly by registered pharmacists have failed repeatedly in our experience.’’

Also reacting in a chat with Vanguard, Chief Executive Officer of Engraved Pharmacy, Mr Jonah Okotie, said the tariff adjustments showed marginal gains in some areas but little change in critical drug segments.

“Compared to 2023, nothing has changed for antimalarial products. It’s still the same 20 per cent tariff for imported products,” Okotie said but noted modest relief in medical devices.

“On breathing apparatuses and gas masks, there is a reduction from five per cent to zero per cent, which is an improvement and is expected to see the prices on these devices come down,” he stated.

According to him, while the gains may appear limited, they are still significant.

“Though it looks small, it is a very welcome development,” Okotie added.

He stressed that the broader objective of boosting local pharmaceutical production remained largely unmet.

“Both the 2023 FPM and the 2026 FPM are supposed to promote and enhance local production capabilities, but more needs to be done to make this a reality,” he said.

Reacting to the tariff cut yesterday, the President, All Farmers Association of Nigeria, AFAN, Mohammed Magaji, described the Federal Government’s action as discouraging to Nigerian rice farmers.

He said: “It discourages the Nigerian farmers from going to the farm, honestly speaking, because there is no good price, there is no market.

“Unfortunately, the price of inputs, including fertilisers, agrochemicals and the rest are going up. The government should have a rethink on this policy.

“We are appealing to the government to have a rethink on it and give us a chance to produce what we eat and eat what we produce.”

On his part, the Chief Farmer of Africa and Team Lead, JetFarmsNG, Jeremiah Olanrenwaju, said: “This policy is a serious setback for local rice farmers. Reducing import duty on bulk rice from 70% to 47.5% and broken rice to 30% will make imported rice significantly cheaper, putting immediate pressure on locally produced rice.

"For farmers already dealing with high input costs, logistics challenges, and limited access to finance, this creates an uneven playing field. At harvest, many of us may be forced to sell below cost, leading to losses and discouraging further investment in rice production.

“Farmers must be extremely cautious this season. This is not the year to expand blindly. Focus on efficiency, secure buyers early, and avoid overproduction without clear market access.

"With this being an election year, policy directions may shift quickly, and food production could be negatively impacted if farmers pull back. While importers may benefit from this policy, local producers face uncertainty that could affect supply in the long term.

“At this critical moment, the government must act swiftly to support farmers before production begins. We need targeted input subsidies, access to affordable financing, and guaranteed offtake mechanisms to stabilize the market.

"Supporting local farmers now is essential to protect national food security and prevent deeper reliance on imports.”

Automobile sector raise queries

An automobile Marketing Communication Consultant and Professor of Marketology, Advertising and Public Relations, Professor Oscar Odibo, while reacting, welcome the development, expressing worries that government could wake up and change policies, either for good or bad.

He advised industry operators to take advantage of the tariff reduction to import as many cars as they could, even if it meant taking bank loan to do so.

He pointed out that his concerns over the new tariff was people who have invested heavily in local auto assemblies in the country.

He said: “With the tariff reduction, the danger in this is that the progress recorded by the local automotive assemblers will disappear because the investments in the assemblies will be affected, including employment of youths.

“Most people have invested millions of dollars in these local plants and the implication is that the progress made so far will be reversed.

Continuing he queried: “What do you expect the local auto assembler to do? This can discourage genuine investors in local assembly businesses.

Odibo, however, advised the federal government to reduce tariff on auto spare parts, rather than cars, in order to support the growth of local assembly plants which would create jobs.

He further suggested that the government should also deal directly with the local assemblers because they were the real investors and not cash and carry businessmen who only imported and sold cars without creating jobs

Also in his reaction, Mr Ifeanyi Agwu, Managing Director of BKG Exhibitions, organisers of the Lagos and Abuja International Auto shows, wondered what the Federal Government had done about the local auto assembly plants.

“What I would like to know is what has the government done to secure the local assemblies? Did they leave it as it was? Did they reduce the tariff on imported parts as well? If they didn’t do that, I don’t know what they want to achieve with the new tariff.

"We need to know if the adjustment is for fully built cars and spare parts before we commend or condemn the new policy,” he said. (Vanguard)

Update news