By LANRE OGUNDIPE

“The institutional goal of science is the extension of certified knowledge.”

— Robert K. Merton

Certification is not ceremonial. It is procedural. It is earned through disciplined inquiry, supervised research, peer review, and intellectual defence. It is recorded, verified, and preserved within the institutional memory of academia. When certification becomes ambiguous, authority itself becomes fragile.

Nigeria today faces a quiet but consequential erosion in the meaning of one of its most recognisable academic distinctions—the title “Dr.” What was historically reserved for individuals who completed rigorous postgraduate research and successfully defended original scholarship is increasingly treated as a decorative prefix in public life.

An earned doctorate represents methodological discipline, intellectual labour, and verified scholarly contribution. An honorary doctorate represents institutional recognition of achievement or service. Both possess value. But they are not equivalent. They were never intended to be.

Yet across Nigeria’s public sphere the distinction is often blurred. Recipients of honorary doctorates frequently adopt the unqualified prefix “Dr.” in political campaigns, corporate communication, religious platforms, and public identity branding. Over time repetition normalises equivalence. Equivalence dilutes meaning. And dilution erodes standards.

This development is no longer merely a matter of etiquette. It has become a question of institutional governance.

The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria vests authority in the state to regulate educational standards. Section 4 grants legislative powers to the National Assembly, while Item 60 of the Exclusive Legislative List empowers the Federation to coordinate university education and regulate institutions responsible for academic standards. Sections 16 and 18 further mandate the State to promote efficient and dynamic education.

Pursuant to this constitutional authority, the National Universities Commission (NUC) was established under the National Universities Commission Act (Cap N81, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004). Section 4 of that Act empowers the Commission to lay down minimum academic standards and accredit academic awards.

If the state can regulate degrees, it must also protect the integrity of the titles that represent those degrees.

Yet a troubling regulatory gap persists. While the NUC accredits programmes and supervises universities, its authority to regulate the public representation of honorary doctoral titles remains largely advisory. It may discourage misuse, but it lacks explicit statutory enforcement powers to prevent confusion between honorary recognition and earned scholarship.

This silence has created a dangerous grey zone.

Under current criminal law, misuse of academic titles becomes actionable mainly when it intersects with fraud—such as impersonation or obtaining benefits under false pretence. Outside those circumstances, ambiguity persists even when the representation misleads the public.

Ambiguity, even when not criminal, has systemic consequences.

Academic titles function as signals within a knowledge economy. Employers rely on them. International collaborators rely on them. Funding agencies rely on them. When those signals become elastic, credibility contracts.

Nigeria aspires to global competitiveness in research, innovation, and higher education. Universities seek international partnerships, research grants, and improved global rankings. These ambitions require the reliability of academic certification. A doctoral title must convey the same meaning in Abuja as it does in Oxford, Berlin, or Toronto: verified scholarly attainment.

Recent developments within Nigeria’s legal profession illustrate that this concern is no longer theoretical. The Body of Senior Advocates of Nigeria (BOSAN) recently cautioned Senior Advocates against using the prefix “Dr.” in court where the title derives solely from an honorary doctorate. The warning reflects a growing awareness among professional institutions that honorary recognition must not be mistaken for certified academic achievement.

When even the legal profession begins to safeguard the distinction between honour and scholarship, the message is clear: precision in professional titles matters.

Nigeria’s own regulatory culture already recognises this principle in other fields. The Medical and Dental Council of Nigeria, for example, strictly regulates who may present themselves as a medical doctor. Misrepresentation in clinical settings attracts sanction because professional trust depends on verified training and licensure.

No one Interprets such regulation as hostility to honour. It is simply protection of public trust.

Academic titles deserve similar clarity.

The proliferation of honorary doctorate awards—sometimes conferred by institutions whose accreditation histories are unclear or contested—has intensified the urgency of reform. Universities have every right to celebrate distinguished citizens who contribute meaningfully to society. Recognition of excellence beyond academia enriches national culture.

But recognition must not become credential simulation.

There is also a democratic dimension to this issue. Citizens rely on public titles to assess authority and expertise. When honorary awards are presented indistinguishably from earned academic credentials, the public may infer scholarly competence where none was formally conferred. Such ambiguity undermines transparency.

Transparency is the foundation of democratic trust.

Nigeria therefore needs deliberate regulatory clarity. The National Assembly should consider legislative amendments that explicitly distinguish honorary doctoral awards from earned doctoral degrees within statutory language governing higher education.

Such reforms could empower the National Universities Commission to issue binding regulations on the formal use of academic titles, require honorary degree recipients to indicate “Honoris Causa” in official representations, and introduce proportionate civil sanctions for deliberate academic misrepresentation.

These measures would not diminish honour. They would protect scholarship.

Nigeria’s intellectual infrastructure depends on reliable academic signals. When the meaning of “Dr.” becomes negotiable, the value of earned scholarship depreciates. When scholarship depreciates, the credibility of universities declines. And when universities lose credibility, national development itself suffers.

Academic integrity is not symbolic. It is structural.

The State’s constitutional duty to promote efficient and dynamic education cannot coexist with permissive ambiguity surrounding the nation’s highest academic distinction. Protecting the meaning of “Dr.” is not about prestige. It is about preserving the integrity of certification—the very mechanism through which knowledge becomes credible.

Nigeria possesses the constitutional authority. The legal framework already exists. What remains is regulatory courage.

Honour is important.

Scholarship is indispensable.

They must never be confused.

•Ogundipe, Public Affairs Analyst, former President Nigeria Union of Journalists and the Federation of African Journalists, writes from Abuja.

Update news