Transition from fuel-powered to electric cars: Outlook for OPEC Member States, By Chijioke Nwaozuzu

Posted by News Express | 25 November 2018 | 1,715 times

Gmail icon

•Prof Chijioke Nwaozuzu

In 2009, Margaret Atwood wrote a piece entitled The Future without Oil for the German newspaper, Die Zeit. In that article, she averred: “It’s not climate change, it’s everything change.”

The above piece, which is as relevant today as ever, presents us a picture of a possible future of an earth when fossil fuel is no more, or becomes obsolete; and thus prompts us to ask ourselves this pertinent question: What do we wish to create for ourselves today and for our future generations?

For years, member states of the Organisation of Petroleum Countries (OPEC) have depended on crude oil revenue for developing their economies. While it is not a crime to benefit from natural resources such as oil, over-dependence on a single natural resource for satisfying immediate needs without thinking of the future, presents potentials of catastrophic consequences - as is evidenced today.

Most developed countries are actively producing electric cars, hybrid vehicles, etc. India and China have also indicated an interest in this transition with about 10 year’s deadline from now. This transition would likely impact the export of crude oil and revenue streams of OPEC member states.

African countries, like other resource-rich jurisdictions, have had series of windfalls in oil revenue; yet, with minimal impact on the ordinary citizens; due to fiscal recklessness exhibited by some governments during periods of oil boom.

In Nigeria, for instance, petroleum accounts for about 90 per cent of foreign revenue; yet, it only contributes about 14 per cent to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

Over-reliance on crude oil as a major export revenue earner in Nigeria beclouded development of other productive sectors, which even contribute more to the GDP.

Furthermore, the over-reliance on crude oil, which price is prone to vagaries of or volatility in the international oil market, exposes OPEC member states to uncertainties in revenues, especially in periods of burst, leaving most of the economies with minimal revenues to fall back on.

While the current oil glut is biting hard on most export-dependent nations, other crude-oil-rich countries who had strategic plans for the future - Norway, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, among others - have less to worry about, because they all made provisions for the uncertain future.

Such futuristic strategy is what differentiates them from their African counterparts, some of which engaged in saving some of their resource revenue for the future generation, in what is called the Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF).

Today, some of these stabilisation funds from oil revenues are running into billions of dollars, which would provide economic stability for those economies in the future, should oil run out or is replaced by another resource.

Even though some African nations have made efforts at averting the potential uncertainties inherent in the commodity market – because of boom-bust cycle - by establishing an Excess Crude Account (as is the case with Nigeria) or Sovereign Wealth Fund, it has only achieved mixed success in creating the framework for savings during high oil price regimes.

Where there were successes in savings, it helped to smoothen government finances and budget, attracted international agencies, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to back fiscal reforms (as in Nigeria). It has, however, not proved a good mechanism for ring-fencing savings, as it did not have a legal provision for sharing of revenue among various tiers of government.

This, in itself, is a major flaw of the savings programme, as it was not directed to the future, but for immediate sharing between the various tiers of government. As a consequence, there has been large- scale theft, funds misapplication and mismanagement, as is the case with Nigeria.

The aftermath of the above failure in Nigeria was the initiation of the Sovereign Wealth Act in 2011, intended to invest oil earnings during windfall periods into infrastructure development as well as providing funds (stabilisation funds) for the future generation. 

Even with this, the management of the fund has been froth with issues of transparency. This is not peculiar to Nigeria alone, as some other African countries (like Libya) have had their share of funds mismanagement. Despite this absurdity, there should be a renewed effort on the part of OPEC member state governments at providing for a future without oil.


Economic diversification

The oil sector creates fewer jobs (about 1 per cent, in the case of Nigeria), and the instability of revenue from oil could impact overall growth of the economy (through changes in government spending), fiscal and external reserves position, and employment.

Diversification here implies development of the non-oil sectors (for example, agriculture, manufacturing, services, etc) and reducing oil dependency, as well as creating a non-oil economy that has the potential to sustain a high-level of government revenue, and creating more jobs. 

It is imperative for the governments of oil-dependent economies to begin to diversify their economic base in order to reduce exposure to the inherent volatility and uncertainties which characterise the international crude oil market: improve private sector employment opportunities, drive up productivity, and strategically establish the non-oil sector of the economy, which in the future would act as a “safety net”, when revenue from oil may become insignificant.

To diversify the economy and, thus, reduce over-reliance on oil revenues, there is urgent need for national development plans geared towards boosting human capital development, rapid and consistent industrial expansion with the capacity to employ skilled labour, as well as mobilising the services sectors which has the capacity to boost revenue for these countries.

To realise these goals would require a stable economic environment devoid of high inflationary trends, a business environment that is strengthened and liberalized, such as would encourage trade and foreign direct investment, a deepened financial sector, as well as expanded and fortified educational system. These will impact and support private sector-driven economic activities, especially in the non-oil sectors, thereby providing jobs today and for the future generation.

There is no doubt that complete diversification of the economy from oil to non-oil sectors is a difficult task. However, timely implementation of adequate policies will help in its achievement.

Lessons of such policies and diversification efforts could be learnt from countries like Indonesia, Malaysia and Mexico, which have been able to implement diversification of their economies from oil, with huge successes recorded. These countries did not only create favourable business and economic environments, but also focused on quality upgrading as well as encouraging their manufacturing companies to develop export markets.

Fiscal responsibility

In the case of Nigeria, government revenues or finances over the years have been handled with high level of fiscal irresponsibility, characterised by misuse and mismanagement of revenues from crude oil exports, thereby jeopardising infrastructural development goals.

Today, the era of fiscal irresponsibility has to be jettisoned and addressed as a misnomer of the past, in order to garner ample revenue for driving sustainable development initiatives for our future generations.

Furthermore, government should as a matter of importance, strengthen the agencies responsible for the management of the Sovereign Wealth Fund, to insulate it from political pressures and interests.

Improvement in the taxation system

The objective of a good tax system is to guarantee long-term fiscal stability of government programmes and policies. Thus, appropriate tax administration is necessary to ensure that tax-payers comply with the provisions of tax laws and that the funds derived are paid into government coffers.

Over the years, however, tax systems in developing countries have had mixed results. It has been estimated by the Global Financial Integrity that outflows from developing countries due to tax avoidance/evasion and illicit financial flows amount to about $1 trillion each year. This is especially rife in countries with weak tax collection institutions and systems.

Therefore, countries should develop strategies for tightening every loophole to ensure appropriate tax collection; since such revenue could boost government finances needed for funding developmental projects.

Boosting small and medium scale enterprises (SMEs)

New firms and innovative SMEs play an increasing role as drivers of growth and job creation in most economies. A number of countries have witnessed, and are still witnessing, successful SME-led economic growth and development.

For instance, in India, over 95 per cent of industrial units are within the small-scale sector, with a 40 per cent value addition in the manufacturing sector. Enterprises of this type provide the second highest employment levels, behind agriculture and accounts for the 40 per cent of their industrial production.

Thus, developing countries can learn a lesson from this example and, thus, create and stimulate an environment which incentivises SMEs growth. This is a sure way of increasing GDP growth, while mobilising technical skills that will drive the future generation in an environment devoid of oil revenue.

Sustainable development policies

Sustainable development has the capacity to fundamentally strengthen adaptive capacity and safeguard national economies’ long-term prospects in the face of decreasing revenues from natural resources.

Thus, going forward, national policies should be geared towards increasing the socio-economic well-being of its citizens (in both the short-term and long-term) through maximisation of the inflows of income without diminishing the total stock of national assets.

Concluding remarks

To achieve the goals of sustainable development - which means “meeting the needs of today without compromising the potential for meeting the needs of future generations” - OPEC member states must as a matter of urgency consolidate their fiscal systems and stabilise their macro-economic environment, with rapid and sustained effort at diversifying their economies.

Member states need, also, to broaden the export market potentials with a diversified export mix, and above all develop strategies for resource mobilisation that will entrench capital formation requisite for meeting the needs of future generations.

To guarantee a sustainable future without oil, therefore, countries should begin to adopt a Savings Policy in the interest of the present and future generations. Such savings would act as real stabilisation funds or buffers at such times when oil revenue may become insignificant.

Such savings could be set aside for investment in low-risk bonds, so as to earn greater returns for the government and, thus, provide for the future generations. It is imperative to save today, so as to protect the economy from volatility in the international oil market, thereby providing sustainable capital growth that will serve as the buffer or “safety net” for present and future generations.

Some other important safeguards against crude oil price volatility are as follows:

1. Utilising crude oil and natural gas as feedstock, that is, expanding the scope of the downstream petroleum sector;

2. Forging a strong linkage of the upstream and downstream sectors of the oil industry;

3. Linking the petroleum sector with other productive sectors, for example, agriculture, mining, manufacturing, etc;

4. Prudent management of costs of oil and gas operations;

5. Finding a balance between the removal of fuel subsidies and providing “safety nets” for the citizens;

6. Curtailment of government revenue mismanagement, misappropriation and misapplication; and

7. Massive investments in infrastructure development to create for the government expenditure multiplier effects on the economy.

Conscious effort needs to be made today, to liberate countries from the shackles of the “Dutch Disease” tendencies, which have bedevilled most oil-producing nations for decades.

The key to this is “Mobilsing today for a future without oil.”

It was not raining yet when Noah built his famous Ark!

•Prof Nwaozuzu, Former Deputy-Director at Emerald Energy Institute (for Energy & Petroleum Economics, Policy, & Strategic Studies), University of Port Harcourt; e-mail: Tel: 070 6874 3617 (SMS Only)

Source: News Express

Readers Comments

0 comment(s)

No comments yet. Be the first to post comment.

You may also like...