Posted by News Express | 23 April 2016 | 2,700 times
Some members of the Fulani ethnic nationality are a unique brand of people, in the sense that they are perpetually nomadic. The nomadic nature of these people has made it impossible to precisely pin them down to any specific geo-political locale, but for purposes of intellectual discourse, the Fulani are northerners of Northern Nigeria. The Fulani also share similarities with other nomadic populations in some neighbouring sub-regional political entities in West Africa. Lately, the Fulani have attracted a rash of commentaries around the issues of banditry, terrorism and the violence some of them have continuously unleashed on host communities while they are engaged in their cattle-rearing activities.
There have been reported incidents of vandalisation of farms and killing of farmers caused by these Fulani herdsmen, just as their dastardly criminal acts of blood-cuddling attacks of farming communities have assumed frightening dimensions since one year ago when Major-General (rtd) Muhammadu Buhari of the All Progressives Congress was inaugurated as President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Sadly, the current government has through its ineptitude and conspiratorial silence attracted suspicions from across Nigerians: many have drawn the conclusion that Buhari’s administration tacitly endorsed these murderous campaigns of the Fulani herdsmen, who are kinsmen of the President.
By the last count, the Fulani herdsmen have been pointed at as those who have engaged in the high-profile kidnap of notable politicians, military officers and clerics just as the two prominent incidents involved the kidnap of an Enugu State-based Catholic Priest, Rev Father Aniako, Celestine and the erstwhile Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Chief Olu Falae.
Between Abia/Enugu axis, Fulani herdsmen have also unleashed considerable violence and some biased military commanders recently deployed armed operatives to invade Awgu community in Enugu State whereby 76 Igbo youths were arrested arbitrarily and dumped in Umuahia prison, just because they resisted attempts to take over their ancestral farm lands by the Fulani herdsmen. The military operatives were deployed from the Enugu-based Division of the Nigerian Army.
The extensive reach of the destructions unleashed by the Fulani herdsmen is unbelievably apocalyptic spanning all the six geopolitical entity of Nigeria.
In this piece, therefore, we are compelled to ask the pertinent question of what the Fulani people have become: between being described as terrorists, as most other Nigerians have done, or land grabbers. A quick review of the latest book by the environmental and development consultant for a science magazine and columnist with the British Guardian, Mr Fred Pearce, titled ‘The land grabbers’ (the new fight over who owns the earth) provides better elucidation.
Again, a clearer elucidation of Nigeria’s extant land administration law, known as the Land Use Act of 1978, will give us a better clue as to why most observers think that there is a well-coordinated plot by the Fulani to grab as much strange lands in distant places within Nigeria as they can, especially now that Buhari, a notable Fulani cattle-owner is in power as President of Nigeria.
Recently, the President got some governors to agree to establish ranches in their states as a way of resolving the widening specter of war between the Fulani and other ethnic nationalities.
Most Nigerians are, however, of the opinion that ranches should be established by states, and not the Federal Government, since the extant land use law gives ownership of state lands to the people of the states to be in the custody of their governors.
For the purpose of emphasis, let us review the preliminary chapter of the Land Use Act of 1978, which is the only constitutionally-known land administration law of Nigeria.
Specifically, Land Use Act, in Chapter 202, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria of 1990, provide thus:
“An Act to Vest all Land comprised in the territory of each state (except land vested in the Federal Government or its agencies) solely in the Governor of the State , who would hold such Land in trust for the people and would henceforth be responsible for allocation of land in all urban areas to individuals resident in the state and to organisations for residential, agriculture, commercial and other purposes while similar powers will, with respect to non-urban areas, are conferred on Local Governments.(27th March 1978) Commencement.”
The law, in part 1, generally states thus: “1.Subject to the provisions of this Act, all land comprised in the territory of each State in the Federation are hereby vested in the Governor of that State and such land shall be held in trust and administered for the use and common benefit of all Nigerians, in accordance with the provisions of this Act. 2. (1) As from the commencement of this Act: (a) all land in urban areas shall be under the control and management of the Governor of each State; and (b) all other land shall, subject to this Act, be under the control and management of the Local Government, within the area of jurisdiction of which the land is situated; (2) There shall be established in each State a body to be known as “the Land Use and Allocation Committee”, which shall have responsibility for...”
The foregoing and several other provisions show that the best solution to resolving the growing threats of terrorism of Nigerian communities by some Fulani herdsmen is for the Federal Government to deploy unbiased and professionally-efficient law-enforcement mechanism to arrest and prosecute all Fulani herdsmen bearing arms, and to prosecute those Fulani herdsmen who have unleashed violence on the different Nigerian communities. The laws of Nigeria must not be circumvented because a Fulani Man is Nigerian President. States that are desirous to create ranches should, therefore, proceed to establish such schemes with the support of their state Houses of Assembly and Land Allocation committees as stipulated by the extant Land Use Act.
Speaking globally about the hidden strategies of land grabbers, Mr Fred Pearce, noted in his book quoted aforementioned that the damage they unleash on indigenous communities are extensively unimaginable.
“There is much uncertainty about how much land has been grabbed, and how firm the grasp of the grabbers is. In 2010, the World Bank came up with a figure of 47 million hectares. The Global Land Project, an international research network, hazarded 63 million hectares. The Land Deal Politics Initiative, another network of researchers that helped organise a conference on land-grabbing in the UK in mid-2011 estimated up to 80 million hectares. Within weeks, Oxfam, an aid agency, published its own estimate of 227 million hectares.”
The author noted: “The truth is nobody knows. There is no central register; there is little national transparency. Some of the largest deals I came across were done in secret and unknown even to the most diligent NGOs, while other deals have attracted headlines but have never come to fruition.”
The Nigerian federal and state governments must make hay while the sun shines.
•RIGHTSVIEW appears on Wednesdays, in addition to special appearances. The Columnist, popular activist Emmanuel Onwubiko, is a former Federal Commissioner of Nigeria’s National Human Rights Commission and presently National Coordinator of Human Rights Writers’ Association of Nigeria (HURIWA). He can be reached via 08033327672 (sms only) or via firstname.lastname@example.org
No comments yet. Be the first to post comment.