Drama at Delta Guber Tribunal as Ogboru’s star witness affirms Okowa’s victory

Posted by Osteen Oyibode, Asaba | 2 September 2015 | 4,450 times

Gmail icon


The petition filed by the Labour Party (LP) and its gubernatorial candidate in the April 11, 2015 governorship election in Delta State, challenging the election victory of Senator Ifeanyi Okowa of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) suffered yet another major setback yesterday.

There was a mild drama at the resumed hearing of the substantive suit when Mr. Felix Enabor, the star witness of Labour Party and its candidate, Chief Great Ogboru, publicly declared that Senator Okowa duly won the election, having polled the highest votes.

The three-man tribunal hearing the cases had earlier affirmed that Mr. Enabor is hostile to the petitioners. Chairman of the tribunal, Justice Nasiru Gunmi, held that the star witness has not only suddenly abandoned them but that he has turned hostile.

Counsel to  LP and Ogboru , Mr. Robert Emukpoeruo, had informed  the tribunal that certain portions in  paragraphs 5,6, and 7 of  their witness, Mr. Enabor, from Independent National Electoral  Commission (INEC) statement on oath, contained  depositions that  are “animus and hostile” to their petitioners.

Expectedly, the motion elicited objections and counter objections from counsels to both parties to the dispute.

In his ruling, Justice Gunmi upheld the position of the petitioners, saying: “We have carefully examined the deposition of Principal Witness 2 and we are of the view that some of the paragraphs in the said deposition stands against the pleading of the petitioners, we therefore agree with the petitioners counsel that it was right to treat pw2 as hostile witness for the purpose of being cross examined by the petitioners counsel.”

Soon after the court declared Mr. Felix Enabor as a hostile  witness, Justice  Gunmi asked Ogboru’s counsel,  Mr. Dele Adesino (SAN) to proceed with his cross examination, where  Enabor  responded to questions saying that the governorship election conducted by INEC in Delta state was done in compliance with the Electoral Act.

Enabor, under examination by the counsel of Okowa, PDP and INEC, Mr. Ken Mozie (SAN), Timothy Kehinde (SAN) and Dr. Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN) respectively, also affirmed that  he was not the maker of the documents that were tendered in court but that he came only to tender them.

He also said that he did not come to court with ill feelings as he was a civil servant, adding that paragraph 5 of the deposition he made in court over the stolen INEC document and the arrest of some persons in connect to the criminal act was based on police investigation and report, saying that he has no animosity against those arrested.

He said he stood by the averments made in the depositions in his statement to the tribunal on oath, adding that Senator Ifeanyi Okowa is the duly elected candidate in the governorship election of Delta State having polled the highest votes.

Enabor also told the tribunal that some of the data captured in the card reader were not captured in the field before the saver was shut dawn.

Attempt by Ogboru’s counsel to subject the witness to another round of cross examination after the court declared him hostile elicited another round of argument as respondent’s counsels vehemently opposed the move.

According to Adesina, the subpoenaed order on the witness has not been vacated by the tribunal, adding that there are some documents that the witness needed to tender before the tribunal.

Mozie strongly opposed it saying: “The argument  is grossly  mischievous , he has been cross examined , he has deposed to his statement , adding that  the subpoena was issued  on the application of the  petitioners .

I submit that no provision of the law for disjointed presentation of evidence, I submit that he can no longer give evidence and should be allowed to go.

Kehinde in his opposition submitted that “the witness cannot come back to give evidence in chief because there is no provision in our justice system that evidence should be done in bits as he did not apply to make the witness present or tender  his document  before declaring him hostile.

Kehinde argued further, that the petitioner can bring any document through other witness, saying they either sink or swim with the witness

Ikpeazu, on his part aligned with the submission of the other respondent counsel, adding that the witness has told the tribunal that all the documents needed had been produced.

He informed the court that the prosecution made a very serious  and dangerous choice to the effect  that they would rather  treat the witness as hostile witness  which  was an abandonment  of a friendly witness , if  they have to tender any document, it has to come through another witness, the petitioner had made wrong choice.

Ruling on the matter, Justice Gunmi disallowed the moves by the petitioners to compel the witness to tender further document or keep him any longer as witness as they have declared him as a hostile witness.

He adjourned further hearing on the matter to September 7, 2015.


Source: News Express

Readers Comments

0 comment(s)

No comments yet. Be the first to post comment.


You may also like...