Posted by News Express | 5 June 2021 | 301 times
States, provinces or regions, as the case may be, are essential components of federations and must meet certain conditions to make sense. To begin with, federalism is a mode of political organisation that unites separate states or other polities within an overarching political system in a way that allows each to maintain a measure of control over its territory, making it a federating unit. Nigeria is one of the 25 federations in the world, but with the queerest composition.
According to UNDP and OECD standards, population, land mass, economic viability, and human capacity are the four universal elements that guarantee a nation's quest at providing good livelihood to her citizens . These factors ought to be the beacons guiding state creation in Nigeria, but it is hardly the case.
State creation in Nigeria has been essentially a military adventure with little or no real inputs from the citizens. Though some criteria have often been cited as guiding the exercise each time, the very nature of military governments did not permit objective assessment and interrogations of the processes that led to the new states. The military regime in power will always create the states it wanted, and that will be it.
Otherwise Savanna state is one that would have come into being if, indeed, the factors that would qualify an entity as a federating state have been fairly considered. During the last exercise conducted by the Gen Sani Abacha regime, the proposed Savannah state came second to Ekiti State in terms of rating. With the largest land mass and an attendant high population figure, projected at over 2 million as at 2020, why new states like Ekiti, Bayelsa and Gombe, much less than in all considerable criteria, came ahead of it, is still baffling.
Ordinarily, a federating state could be a nation if circumstances had allowed and in most federations, nationalities come together to form a union for political economies of scale. But, in the Nigerian experience, the reverse is the case: Nigerian nation was first forced into existence by the colonial power, Great Britain, and then the federating units were carved out of it by the variegated military authorities mostly on the whim.
One thing about state creation in Nigeria is that, apart from the first (4th region), they were all done by the military regimes, mostly swayed by politics rather than by economic viability. The creation of the Mid-Western Region in 1963 could pass as the first state creation that ever took place in Nigeria and the only one carried out under a civil rule. Even that too was tainted with politics.
Though, in Nigeria, state creation was originally conceived as a solution to the problems of ethnic minority groups, the main reason adducible for the creation of the Mid- Western Region could be to free the minorities of the Western Region. But informed observers believe the exercise was aimed by the ruling political parties to break Awo’s Action Group’s stranglehold on the Western Region and give them a leeway. Otherwise why didn’t the government of the day constituted by the Northern Peoples Congress (NPC) and National Council of Nigerian Citizens (NCNC) extend the same gesture to the minorities of their own Regions, namely, the Middle Belt and the South-south?
With benefit of hindsight, some informed minds have argued that if the minorities of the North and East were carved out at the same time, maybe, the Eastern Region would not have been such a powerful monolith to attempt to break away as Republic of Biafra and Nigeria would have balanced out as a federation of six regions and made faster progress as a united country.
Since this was not the case, how then were states created in Nigeria to miss out vital ones such as Savanna state? The second wave of state creation was in 1967, in the wake of the Nigeria Biafra war. It was meant to break the Eastern Region’s resolve to go away as an independent nation by dividing it up. This motive, again, was not economic or aimed at ensuring viability.
As the experience of the ethnic groups seeking to be carved out as Savanna state has shown, exploitative relationships have often characterised the interaction between the minority and the dominant group in Borno where the Kanuri hold the ace and calls the shot. The inferior status, which these Borno minority ethnic groups have donned over the decades, explains the conflict pervading the area, culminating in much of the space becoming ungoverned and reeking with insurgency.
What the ethnic minorities of Borno are facing is the same as what ethnic minorities worldwide go through. But the difference is that most countries of the world that have this problem find creative ways to eliminate or reduce minority situations. Rather than allow ethnocide and genocide to reign, more positive measures such as assimilation, constitutional safeguards, reversal of status and territorial solution have been employed by those other countries.
So, seeking a Savanna state by these minority ethnic groups is well within the solutions that have worked for other nations. Why the Savanna state seekers are desperately looking for a territorial solution is simply for the reason that the majority ethnic group has not allowed fairness, equity and social justice.
The quest for Savanna state dates back to 1982, when the people first presented the request for the creation to the National Assembly of the Second Republic. Between 1983 and 1996, again, especially during the agitation across the country in 1991 for the creation of more states, requests were made for the creation of two states out of the former Borno State, namely, Savanna and Yobe states. The request for the creation of Yobe State was granted, but that of Savanna was not for some inexplicable reasons. The people made the same submission at the National Constitutional Conference through its Committee on States Creation. In 2014, during the National Conference, it was again one of the fourteen (14) states recommended for creation in Nigeria.
The call for Savanna state has been renewed by the people, following the current effort by the 9th National Assembly, to carry out fundamental amendments of the nation’s grundnorm (the 1999 Constitution) to meet the aspirations of Nigerians. This is, therefore, an auspicious time to push it to the front-burner once more.
The principles that underpin the creation of states as stipulated in various theories internationally and locally include the need to bring government closer to the people, the need for even development, the need to preserve peace and harmony among groups, the need to redress minority problems and the need to preserve a federal structure in the case of Nigeria.
One shares the position that state proliferation in Nigeria has not helped and there will be no end to it unless certain irreducible minimum standards warranting state creation are really set and adhered to, to ensure their viability. A situation where most states in Nigeria have to rely on federal allocation to pay salaries is not good enough.
However, the inability of the Nigerian states to hold their own as federating units without recourse to the Federal Government is simply borne out of the nature of federalism that Nigeria operates today, which has been variously described as “feeding bottle federalism.” But even at that, viability can still be calculated through what each state is bringing to table, and Savanna state can compete with most states in Nigeria.
The proposed Savanna state is rich in agriculture and can host agrarian revolution, attract direct foreign investors in the agro-allied sector to help Nigeria become self-sufficient in food productions and exportation. The area also holds great potential for global tourism given its unique cultural and natural endowments that is capable of changing the negative perception of the rest of the world towards Nigeria, raking in money to buoy the nation’s struggling economy and create millions of jobs in the value chain.
This quest is pursuant to and in fulfillment of the provisions of section 8(1)(a) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The proposed Savanna state, to be carved out of the present-day Borno State, is to have the capital at Damboa and covers nine local governments, namely: Askira-Uba Local Government Area, Bayo Local Government Area, Biu Local Government Area, Chibok Local Government Area, Damboa Local Government Area, Gwoza Local Government Area, Hawul Local Government Area, Kwaya-Kusar Local Government Area, and Shani Local Government Area. The population of the proposed Savanna state is 2,000.000 as at September 7, 2020.
In terms of land mass, Borno State as at today is still the largest in the country with an area of about 69,436 sq. kms, and its further breakup will enhance self-determination, compatibility, equitable and even development, and responsive governance. Borno State is too large for effective and efficient state administration and cannot foster even and accelerated development on which the state structure is premised. The practical inability of the government to provide these basic amenities and to harness the state’s rich agricultural potentials have led to socio-economic and political vices, including insurgency.
The proposed Savanna state is richly endowed with solid minerals, agricultural products, tourism potentials and human resources that can be harnessed to lay a solid foundation for the transformation of the state, especially when solid minerals is moved to the Concurrent List of the nation’s 1999 Constitution.
Some of the solid minerals found in commercial quantities in the area are: quartz, kaolin, iron ore, uranium and niobium oxide. Others are limestone, magnesium, bentonite, feldspar, mica, gypsum, granite, silica sand, corundum, sapphire and more.
The proposed Savanna state is located in the Savanna vegetation belt, has vast fertile land for agricultural activities and is suitable for sorghum, millet, maize, cowpea, cotton, groundnut, water melon, cassava, and wheat.
It is expected that the members of the National Assembly, aware of the plights and position of the people, shall dispassionately look into the merits of the demand and do the needful.
The vast human, agricultural, mineral, industrial, commercial, economic, tourist and political potentials of southern Borno coupled with their determination will make the difference. These indicators show that the proposed state has the capacity to develop even more rapidly than some existing states in the country.
State creation in Nigeria has more or less been arbitrarily carried out, paying greater attention to politics than to economic viability. This disposition can be attributed to military regimes, which lack checks and balances. But now that the elected National Assembly, which is answerable to the Nigerian people is in the saddle, it is expected that current exercise will right the wrongs of the past and give the quest for Savanna state the attention it deserves by creating it.
•Onwubiko, head of the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria and former federal commissioner of the Nigerian National Human Rights Commission, blogs @www.huriwanigeria.com; www.emmanuelonwubiko.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
No comments yet. Be the first to post comment.