Military Debarment Allowance: Matters arising, By Abdul Lauya

Posted by News Express | 13 July 2020 | 6,019 times

Gmail icon

•Chief of Defence Staff, Lt.-Gen. Gabriel Olonisakin

In 2012, Air Chief Marshal O.O. Petinrin, the then Chief of Defence Staff, midwifed the 2012 edition of the Manual of Financial Administration for the Armed Forces of Nigeria (MAFA, 2012). The document provided for, among other things, the payment of security debarment allowance to personnel of the Nigerian Armed Forces as obtained in other civilised climes.

Security Debarment Allowance as contained on page 98 of the document is an allowance payable to retired members of the Armed Forces to debar them from using acquired special military skills against the state. It is calculated as 10 per cent of annual salary (at the time of retirement), multiplied by number of years served.

Debarment allowance is a global practice inherited from our colonial masters and other advanced democracies. But for whatever reason, our past senior officers inevitably omitted to include it in the Nigerian Armed Forces Terms and Conditions of Service until now.

Though it was initiated during President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration in 2012, approval was granted by President Muhammadu Buhari in 2018. Before then, in 2017, the News Agency of Nigeria had reported that veterans’ community had dragged the Nigerian Government to the National Industrial Court, Abuja, seeking an order to compel it to gazette and begin the implementation of the document.

But, when implementation begun in first quarter of 2020, only personnel that retired between November 2017 and March 2020 when approval was granted were captured, excluding majority that retired earlier than 2017, including Petinrin, the architect of the document, who retired in 2013.

Since the saga came to limelight in April 2020, a couple of veterans have granted interviews to broadcast outlets alerting Nigerians of goodwill of the alleged injustice, seeking their sympathy and intervention. Others have penned down their opinions on the issue in print and online media, all in a bid to enlist the support and understanding of the national and international community. Also, retired generals and Coalition of Concerned Veterans, umbrella body of veterans pressure group in the country, had written the military hierarchy, asking it to listen to voice of reason and stick with the spirit and intent of the document, to avoid defence sector industrial disharmony.

To every discerning mind, the security debarment issue is an unambiguous and straight jacket matter that does not require any legal interpretation. Page 98 of MAFA, 2012 is clear on beneficiaries of the allowance. It stated that security debarment allowance is payable by each service to retired military personnel to debar them from using skills acquired during military service against the state. It did not preclude any segment or specify conditions or qualifications for entitlement.

When a generic policy (as in this case) that borders on reward in retirement, especially one with grave security implications comes to force, it is applied across-the-board for obvious reasons.

To start with, what is the purpose of the security debarment allowance? “To debar military retirees from using skills acquired in service against the state.” This means that the allowance exists to provide legal backing in case a veteran uses acquired skills negatively against the Nigerian state. In most advanced countries, this has provided alibi for prosecution of veterans when acquired skills are misused.

If the debarment allowance is paid selectively in favour of veterans who retired when the document was assented to as being currently implemented, it is akin to giving a blank cheque to non-beneficiaries to exercise discretion in application of acquired military skills, with attendant security implications.

With the rising wave of violent extremism, insurgency, violent agitations for self-determination/resource control, herders’/farmers’ clashes, kidnappings, banditry, ex-servicemen are ready tools in the hands of enemies of the state. Most of the daring (behind-the-scene) criminal collaborators against the Nigerian state across the country are disgruntled retired military personnel, who either feel shortchanged while in active service or retirement. Debarment allowance will, therefore, provide a legal backing for prosecution of such veterans that deploy acquired special military training/skills against the Nigerian state.

“A veteran is any person who served honourably in the military on active service. As heroes, veterans are appreciated in a way that reflects a fitting gratitude for service rendered and sacrifices shouldered. They are heroes who signed under the pain of death to defend fatherland. They serve and fight for our freedom. Integrity, service, courage, duty, honour, commitment, country and sacrifice are words associated with veterans. This is what makes them special universally” (Wikipedia).

This explains why in the United States and other civilised climes, veterans enjoy special discounts on all goods and services in appreciation of their selfless sacrifices to nation. Most groceries stores, airlines, hospitality industry, etc., run all-year military appreciation/discounts on services for veterans with retired military ID cards.

On the contrary, there is no known subsidy or social investment programme in place for retired members of the Nigerian Armed Forces. Even the so-called National Health Insurance Scheme cannot cater for diabetes, heart, liver, lungs and other serious orthopaedic health conditions contracted during service. Any drug, including those for malaria that is above N500 is not available. Most aged retirees with sight and hearing disabilities, organ-related issues, diabetes, high-blood pressure and other terminal ailments contracted in the line of duty spend their monthly pensions on drugs with nothing left to feed. The result is malnourishment, low self-esteem and untimely deaths.

The Nigerian veterans’ community has a lot of unpleasant experiences over the years regarding their welfare, resulting in the current state of heightened suspicion and mistrust in their dealing with military authorities.

For instance, it has become a recurring decimal that military authorities delay payment of entitlements and benefits to retirees even when funds have been released, ostensibly to allow for depletion in their number through death.

Currently, government owes veterans three months arrears of pensions’ increment approved since 2017. Also, the new minimum wage consequential adjustment has not yet been effected for military pensioners, with 15 months arrears already accumulated.

Experience has shown that the Nigerian government only understands the language of protest and confrontations before yielding to legitimate demands of veterans. From Obasanjo to Yar’Adua and Jonathan’s regimes, payments of accrued allowances or entitlements were secured after protests or threats of demonstration.

Does the current administration want to go the way of previous regimes?

 

 

•Abdul Lauya, a veteran/journalist, who writes from Gombe, is Senior Special Assistant on Media and Publicity to Senator Bulus K. Amos/Gombe South, and can be reached on: lauya4real@yahoo.com; 08023742201.

 


Source: News Express

Readers Comments

0 comment(s)

No comments yet. Be the first to post comment.


You may also like...